GPT and Claude failed Bridgewater's finance tests because the right answers were never public
Bridgewater and a startup from a former OpenAI CTO claim their AI model outperforms GPT and Claude in finance tasks, but the results haven't been verified. The model is said to be more accurate and cheaper to run.
What happened
Bridgewater and Thinking Machines Lab have developed a new AI model called Qwen3-235B, which they claim achieves 84.7% accuracy in financial tasks. This is reportedly better than GPT and Claude, but the results haven't been independently verified.
Why it matters
As a business owner, you might be interested in AI models that can help with finance tasks, such as forecasting or risk analysis. However, without verified results, it's hard to know if this model is reliable. You should be cautious when considering using unverified AI solutions.
The takeaway
For now, it's best to wait for independent verification of the Qwen3-235B model's results before considering it for your business's finance tasks.
Our plain-English take, written from public reporting for operational business owners. Always read the original for full context.
Nayre builds the AI systems behind stories like this.
Chatbots, workflow automation, finance intelligence, and internal knowledge systems. Built for operational teams, shipped in days.